Which IV administration method is considered safer than an IV push?

The volume-controlled infusion method is considered safer than an IV push due to its ability to deliver medications in a more regulated manner. This method uses a device, such as an infusion pump or a burette, to control the rate and volume of fluid being delivered to the patient. This controlled approach minimizes the risk of administering a medication too quickly, which can lead to potential adverse effects, especially for medications that require strict dosages.

In a volume-controlled infusion, the healthcare provider can also more easily monitor the patient's response and adjust the flow rate as needed while ensuring that the patient receives the correct amount of medication over a longer period. This steadier administration can help reduce side effects and increases patient safety, especially for medications that might cause complications if given rapidly.

The other methods mentioned, while beneficial in certain contexts, do not provide the same level of control. Continuous infusion also allows for medication to be administered over time, but it may not be as closely monitored as volume-controlled methods, which specifically allow for careful measurement and delivery. IV piggyback infusion, while safer than an IV push, typically relies on the primary IV line and may still present risks associated with infusion rates during the transition from the primary to secondary line. Subcutaneous infusion, while useful for